Snow Observations List

We rode up Denny Creek and over toward Watkins Creek, etc. We observed two recent natural avalanches that broke 1-2 feet deep, presumably on a surface hoar layer. There was a couple of inches of snow on each of these slides, so I would place them between three and five days old. The slides were R1-D1.5 in size - 75-100' wide, 1-2' deep, and 100' vertical fall. 

We dug a quick pit with a snow height of 120 cm (4 feet) and found one layer of surface hoar buried 5" deep (ECTP2) and 4 Finger + facets near the ground (ECTP26). We were not concerned about natural avalanches today, but they will be a concern with a few inches of new snow or more on any slope on which the surface hoar is present (assume it is everywhere at Lionhead).

My ski partners and I toured up Flanders creek today and found 9"- 11" of new low density snow. We dug a pit at the base of the SE bowl of Flanders at 9500 ft. The snowpack was 90 cm deep, slightly shallower than what we found on Divide peak last weekend. We found that the new snow was sherring easily in hand pits and we got an ECTP 6 on this interface in our pit. The layers beneath the new snow were faceted junk but not reactive in our tests. The new snow sitting on a firm crust layer was our main concern. 

We toured into Beehive for day 2 of our AAI pro 1 avalanche course. We decided to tour up the ridge between “Going Home” and “Tyler’s Run”. We dug three pits as a group on a W aspect at 8700 feet and found generally stable results with no prolongation observed in any of the three pits. We did find a layer of buried surface hoar approximately 37cm below the surface, but evidence that the surface hoar has begun to break down, sinter, and gain strength. We found approximately 10-12in of new snow at elevations above 8,000 ft, which was more than we were expecting. Light snow continued throughout the day with 2-4 inches of accumulation by 2 PM when we returned to our car. We observed light wind transport at the ridge line, but did not find any wind affected snow on the W aspect that we toured up. 

An ice climber across the valley observed a large natural avalanche running over Silken Falls ice climb on the east side of the Main Fork. Wind was blowing and moving snow all day. This gully gets wind-loaded and was the site of a fatal avalanche in 2009.

My partner and I were out in a zone south of the bacon rind trailhead today and found some good snow. All of the laps we took today we N NE facing slopes and the snow was supportable and generally stable. We were riding on elevations from 7950 to 7200 all day, and only dug one pit but things were encouraging. I did not do a full profile but we did the usual tests. The total snow height was around 110cm and we got a CT14 Q3 and ECTN12 Q1 both breaking in the now snow around 95cm. Without doing crystal ID and differentiating layers I only got a general hardness scale, from top to bottom it was F-4F-1F+-1F-1F+-4F-G with the section near the ground seeming to be weakening. Overall the snowpack was encouraging but we still kept our riding to lower angle slopes focusing on some pillow lines. No surface hoar was found throughout the day and by the time we left the snow started to fly and the wind stayed light blowing to the northern end of the compass. No recent avy activity was seen on the surrounding slopes. Good snow and good vibes. Thank you all for your hard work, the community appreciates and values what you all do every day!

Had some cracking, collapsing of wind drifts up high on the ridge today and few Dry Loose slides running into Wolverine.

Winds were swirling, and coming from the south when I was skiing, but obviously the storm pattern is moving from the north.

Super wind scoured slopes from yesterday not bonding well in other places.

We found bottomless facets on the ski up through the low elevation trees. Once we got close to the ridge we dug a 130 cm pit that was completely unsupportable. It was just layers of facets on facets, ECTX. We then skinned to the top and dug another pit HS100cm, CTX, ECTN25 about 1.5 feet down. There was a supportable slab here and stability was still good. Once this area gets wind and snow I think the danger will bump up quickly. There is so much weak snow around I have a hard time believing it can support much additional weight.

We toured up to the Skillet today. We dug 7 pits on our way up. We found surface hoar buried 6-10” below the surface in all of our pits. This layer failed (ECTN 11 and 12s), but it did not propagate. At this point we were thinking about skiing the Skillet. We dug a pit at the top of the chute at 8,900’. The buried surface hoar was present in this pit, but it did not fail in the ECT. We had an ECTP 22 in facets 2.5’ below the surface of the snow. Because of this result and the terrain traps in the Skillet, we changed our plan and took a more conservative route down. Looking ahead, the buried surface hoar is the primary concern in this area. When we get more snow on top of this layer, instability will increase.

Dug on a sheltered N aspect at 9,000 feet below Alex Lowe Peak. Performed an ECT with results of ECTN 12 at 30cm deep and ECTP 21 near the ground.  
 

We also observed widespread sluffing of the new, low-density snow throughout the day, as well as increasing wind transport in the afternoon. 

Location. North of Hebgen lake 1/2mi east of white peak.
Elevation 9200ft/ Aspect S

moderate winds with strong gusts. Isolated wind slabs observed.  
 

HS 140

Compression test

CTH4 RP @115. CTH9 BRK @40

9300 ft North Aspect

165 height of snow, minimal wind effect

ECTP 22 - 35cm down on the buried surface hoar.

First pit over the weekend that produced propagation and obvious signs of instability.

Signs of Unstable Snow

Recent Avalanches? 

 None Observed 

Cracking? 

 None Experienced 

Collapsing? 

 None Experienced 

We observed a strong cohesive snowpack on a wind loaded slope NE of Two Top. But we noticed three separate buried SH layers. First 5cm from surface second @ 25cm third @55cm. These buried SH layers tend to be touchy. They are concerning in that the deeper layers rest above and below densely packed wind blown slab.

Three separate layers of Buried SH within the top 100cm of the snow pack. The top layer @5cm from the surface is not worrisome at this time but with added snow in the future it has potential to become a problem layer. The second and third layer @25cm,@55cm,from surface could be human triggered, with the potential of a deadly slab avalanche.

Advanced Information

Weather Summary

Cloud Cover:

Partly Cloudy 

Temperature:

17° 

Wind:

Light , SW 

New/Recent Snowfall:

No resent snow 

Upper elevations mostly sunny the past 2 days.Lower elevations experienced AM fog Light winds. We noticed ridge top blowing snow.

Advanced Information

Weather Summary

Cloud Cover:

Partly Cloudy 

Temperature:

17° 

Wind:

Light , SW 

New/Recent Snowfall:

Avalanche Observations

Avalanche Observation Comments:

Observed several natural avalanches on NE ridge at Two Top below cornice in steep wind loaded terrain

Snowpack Observations

NNE aspect 8186ft, 44.62319,-111.24732, HS230,PWL buried SH@ 5cm,25cm,55cm from surface. First test, CTMsc@55 second test CTMsc@25. ECTN27@25 

Layer Depth/Date: Jan.22,2023  
Weak Layer(s):  Jan 5, 2023 (SH) 
Comments: Buried SH 5,25, 55, CTMsc@55, CTMsc@25 ECTN 27@ 25

Buried layers of SH. These layer's seem to be very widespread throughout the region. They are worrisome in that they could be human triggerd with deadly potential.

Terrain Use

Our travel Plan to avoid any terrain greater than 30°. There are many options in this area to have a challenging ride without exposing the group to avalanche hazard.

Yesterday we toured around Mt Blackmore. We decided to make conservative choices and stay out of avalanche terrain and did not dig a full pit. Next to a meadow we did ski, on a northeast aspect above Blackmore lake, we did a quick ski cut on to a steeper slope. This cut readily released the new snow (~8in at this particular location) and it slid for about 50 feet on a 34 degree slope. This location did not present any signs of significant wind loading. The interface below the snow from the weekend will certainly be something to look out with more snow on the way.

We skied around Wolverine Bowl, the Playground, and Texas Meadows.There were 2-3” of new and wind drifted snow. The winds were gusting 15-20 mph and transporting the new snow. We dug in the Playground at 8,000’ on a N facing aspect, the new snow was moving on the old wind slab (ECTN 1), and the wind slab about 1 foot below the surface did not propagate (ECTN13). The unsupportable wind slab in the playground sent us over to Texas Meadows, and we dug at 7,800’ on the NE aspect. We did not see the wind slab here, and we got an ECTP 26 in the facets near the ground (3’ below the surface). It will take a lot more snow and wind to reactivate this layer. Looking forward to tomorrow the new and wind drifted snow is the biggest concern in the Bridgers--especially in complex avalanche terrain and along the ridgeline.

My ski partner and I dug a pit at the base of Divide peak on a SE facing slope at 9,600 ft. We had no failure in our compression test and an ECTX on our column test. The snowpack looked to be completely faceted yet consolidated from the ground to a crust layer just below the new soft snow. There was little evidence of wind loading in the basin and a layer of surface hoar was present on the snow surface. We passed another party who were digging multiple pits on a similar aspect and had the same results we found. We ran into a third party on the summit who dug a pit a few hundred feet from the summit that showed a slightly stiffer slab on the surface but again found stable results. This is still a tricky snowpack and this only shows that conditions were stable on this day at very specific locations. If you venture into Hyalite still do your homework before dropping in! 

Visible transport on with wind direction shifting from SW to NW in the afternoon. Dug at 7760' asp 85deg slope angle 20 deg on the South side of Bradley's. HS 180 ECTP10 down 25cm. 1F+ hard wind slab over F hardness snow. Slab was not consistent on that aspect at that elevation, we definitely hunted for potential reactivity with many handpits during an avalanche course. 

We skied down the "skyline" ridge of Saddle Peak. Recent strong winds drifted snow into small 4" soft slabs near the ridgelines, and there were a variety of new and old hard slabs and scoured surfaces throughout all elevations on the descent. We dug a pit around 9,000' and had an ECTP14 6-10" deep below a very hard slab sitting on sugary facets. We guess this is what the snowboarder triggered avalanche on Wednesday failed on, but that is just a guess. Due to the weak facets some of these hard slabs might be unstable for a few more days. Snow depth was 150-210cm where we dug. There is weak snow near the bottom of the snowpack that we need to remember for when there is heavier loading from snow and wind, but it seems unlikely it will cause an avalanche right now with little recent snowfall. 

Beartooth Powder Guides reported remote triggering a small wind slab on the SH layer and a small natural in the lower part of the Bowl that also likely slid on the fresh SH 40’ wide 4” thick. East aspect 9900’.

From Big Sky Ski Patrol 1/21/23: "skier triggered a surface wind slab in Wyoming Bowl that broke 8-12” deep. It propagated to an estimated 150’ wide- SS, R1/D1.5... The slide was small, no one was hurt, and the avalanche was reported (which we appreciate), with no further public involvement other than the trigger."

Went on a "loop de doop" type of tour yesterday to see conditions around Big Sky. While skiing a north aspect off Middle Peak, we dug a pit around 10k and found a hard 6 inch wind slab on the sitting on top of a firm column, ECTP16 on this top layer and it seemed like this was an isolated problem. We skied a SW aspect from the Bear/Hellroaring ridge and found great, consolidated snow from ridge to creek. We ascended and dug a pit on a NE aspect in Bear basin and found the depth hoar that everyones been talking about, we found this about 2 feet deep and had collapse but no propagation in our stability test. We skied a SW aspect back into Middle Basin in solar affected snow, a few ski cuts cleaned out the chute and the snow ran slow, but capable of taking someone off their feet. Multiple point and release wet snow activities were observed on all similar aspects off of the ridge.